DESIGN CONTRE DESIGN

October 11, 2007

design-contre-design.JPG

Designer: Andre Groult, Object:Life-life chest of drawers, Year:1925

An exhibition organised by the Réunion des musées nationaux.

Since the sixties and the post-modern impact of the eighties, the word ‘design’ has been in trouble. Prey to individual interpretations and long banned from institutional language in France, the word has undergone such inflation that it has become synonymous with “well drawn” or even “trendy”.

Design by design brings together objects and household furniture from the Industrial Revolution to the present day. Rather than follow a chronological arrangement, which is too complex these days, it juxtaposes and draws parallels, triggers surprising short circuits and sparks dialogue between things. This dialogue is enriched by a set of broad essays in the catalogue touching on design and art, fashion, architecture, film, comic books, humour and novels.

FORM

The exhibition starts with formal comparisons: straight lines and geometry, curves and biomorphism, playing with form until it teeters on the brink of imbalance, deformity, formlessness. A library stepladder-stool designed by Joseph Hoffman in 1903 compared with a work by Sol Lewitt, or a wooden sofa by Dannhauser (1825) next to a corrugated cardboard ‘bubble’ chair by the architect Frank O.Gehry (1979) raise questions about the relationship between form and technique. The chairs Thonet designed for a neo-rococo drawing room became the famous “bistrot chairs”. Marcel Breuer’s ‘Wassily’ chair (1925) owes its shape more to nomadic fantasies of bicycles and nineteenth-century camping chairs than to “good design”.

CONTEXT

Next the exhibition looks at the influence of context on industrial design: how is an object shaped by what surrounds it, from the user – the human being – to nature in various forms? Objects like Gaetano Pesce’s Donna or Roger Tallon’s Phantom act like doubles or partners. Plants lend their lines and image to things. Animals are domesticated as bars, consoles, even seats. From baroque grottoes to carpets by Piero Gilardi the mineral kingdom adds its note, linking us to our ancestors the Flintstones. Duchamp and his followers retrieved ready-made objects and have made them part of design. From Russian ‘back to the earth’ armchairs of 1880 to the accumulations of the Campana brothers or Stuart Haygarth, industrial or discarded objects have taken a new lease on life.

ARCHITECTURE

A distinction is drawn between objects inspired by architecture and objects that claim to be architecture. Classical cabinets by Piero Fornassetti, Towers by Ettore Sottsass, “Sunset over Manhattan” by Gaetano Pesce play with proportions and Gulliver’s fantasies. But when a seat becomes a shell or a sofa folds in on itself, it becomes a protective, isolating envelope. From the Biedermeier shell seat to Eero Aarnio’s sphere and the Bouroullec brothers’ raised enclosed bed (Lit Clos) we see a trend towards cocoon furniture shared by many contemporary artists and architects.

STYLES

Providing a break in the exhibition, the two rotundas which join the galleries together explore the persistence of western or exotic styles with a few star pieces such as Jeroen Verhoeven’s Cinderella desk, a radiator with concrete branches by Joris Laarman or Robert Stadler’s exploded sofa.

Three monumental pieces anchor the circuit: Zaha Hadid’s Iceberg bench, Womb House by the Van Lieshout studio and a Visiona by Verner Panton.
@grandpalais

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: